Jump to: navigation, search

Variety (2004) - Alfred Hitchcock: Finding the Dark Side of Cary Grant

Details

Links

Abstract

He was prepared to follow Alfred Hitchcock's vision to that unconventional conclusion because he had wanted to play more serious roles, and Hitchcock saw something in Cary Grant that made him the ideal Johnnie, alternately sinister and charming. But the studio did not want Cary Grant to play a murderer.

Article

In Alfred Hitchcock's Strangers on a Train, Guy, a handsome tennis pro, meets Bruno, a strange man who proposes that Guy commit a murder for him. We might be watching the first encounter between Hitchcock and his favorite leading man, Cary Grant, for Hitchcock, when they first met, also asked Grant to commit a murder. The victim was to be Lina McLaidlaw (Joan Fontaine), the shy heiress in Suspicion who loves her ne'er-do-well husband, John Aysgarth, so much that she lets him murder her. And Grant would have been delighted to play a murderer-if only the studio had allowed it.

He was prepared to follow Hitchcock's vision to that unconventional conclusion because he had wanted to play more serious roles, and Hitchcock saw something in Grant that made him the ideal Johnnie, alternately sinister and charming. But the studio did not want Cary Grant to play a murderer. Three (and possibly four) endings were filmed-but ultimately the finished version shows Grant's character as strangely innocent, contradicting much that came before. "I thought the original was marvelous. It was a perfect Hitchcock ending," Grant would later say.

The professional relationship between Grant and Hitchcock was occasionally difficult. Talking about the advantages of stars vs. unknowns, Hitchcock dryly observed: "Once you decide to go after Cary Grant, the question of suitability takes second place to the question of availability." Despite their successes, he was unable to lan...

[ to view the rest of the article, please try one of the links above ]